Tribal identity in the mountainous Darjeeling
area of West Bengal is being used as a tool by the state to dismantle
the renewed Gorkha agitation. An analysis of the ways in which the
classificatory arrangement by which the state identifies and designates
communities as tribes has become a politically provocative and
productive tool to divide the hill communities.
This brief communiqué is but a reflection on the contemporary tribal
situation in Darjeeling hills, West Bengal. Besides being the historical
site of a durable ethnic conflict (i e, known as Gorkhaland movement)
Darjeeling hills have acquired political prominence in the recent past
for being the playground of intra-ethnic revivalism and tribalism. In
addition to the Bhutias, Lepchas, Sherpas and Yolmos – the already
designated tribes of Darjeeling district since India’s independence –
majority of the hill communities today are busy both in claiming and
establishing their claims of being a tribe of the region.
Nepali Social Structure
Indian Nepalis corroborate to the idea of a speech community that is
composed of both caste Hindus and Indo-Mongoloid groups. Caste system
has been the historical basis of Nepali social structure. Since Nepali
caste system in Darjeeling hills has been lax in nature compared to its
Nepal counterpart,[1]
it successfully accommodated the Indo-Mongoloid groups into its fold.
Sanskritsation had been at work in the hills ever since the mid-19th
century. Available historical data is capable of establishing the fact
that the Mongoloid communities felt content with the Nepali caste system
and quite often despised the cause of being tribes.[2]
But in the new millennium the Tamangs along with Limbus did mobilise
themselves for tribal status and were accorded with the scheduled tribe
(ST) status in 2002. This energised the other Mongoloid groups (like
Rais, Magars, Gurungs, Sunwars, Yakhas, Thamis to name a few) of
Darjeeling hills clamour for the ST status. Such a programmatic vision
for the attainment of protective discrimination measures by the majority
of the hill communities is certainly an unprecedented phenomenon that
ran parallel with the movement called Gorkhaland.
As is well known, tribal identity especially among the caste Hindu
Nepalis, is arguably a contentious issue. During the late 1990s Subhash
Ghising had to face socio-political upheavals as a ready reaction to his
decision to play out the “tribal identity card” as a hold-all
phenomenon for all the hill Nepalis including the Bahuns and Chhetris
(twice born high castes) while the government took a “safer” stand by
not indulging into the affairs of the hills. Similar kind of social
undercurrent is at work now but the hill communities seem to be in
agreement with the political project of tribal status so much so that
the tagadharis (men of sacred thread – the higher caste groups) are inclined to join the race in which their matwali (men of liquor – the low caste/ status groups) counterparts have already made some discernable progress.
Role of GTA
These issues become a matter of wider significance when one notices
that the tripartite agreement called Gorkhaland Territorial Administration (GTA), signed on 18 July, 2011, and the subsequent
approval of the GTA Act, 2011 by the government by March 2012
incorporates in it a provision stipulating that the state government
facilitate the demand of ST status for all the Gorkhas except the
scheduled castes. Not surprisingly, the three designated Nepali
scheduled castes like Kami (barbers), Damai (tailors), and Sarki
(cobbler) numbering roughly 78,000 (as per 2001 census)[3] have now jumped into the bandwagon.
It is interesting to note that growing tribalism in Darjeeling hills
has appeared as a livewire of hill politics at that period of time when
ethnic revivalism took place in much more prominent fashion in
neighbouring Nepal since the 1990s.
The ethnic revivalism that took place in Nepal since the 1990s is
largely based on the attempts to ethnicise caste and community
identities to search for an alternative non-hierarchical social
imaginary that could provide an egalitarian alternative identity and can
even alter the given power structures of society. The inclination to
ethnicise community identities while rebuffing sanskritisation is at
work in the contemporary Darjeeling hills.
To effectively mobilise the aspiration to become a tribe the
Mongoloid communities are foregrounding their past traditions to address
the “authentic” and “indigenous” qualifiers of being a tribe. An equal
amount of emphasis is also being given to distance their communities
from the “vices” of sanskritisation – which they now consider as a
process that weakened their organic link with the rich heritage of a
“tribalist past”.
Tribal Development Board
The problem becomes more intricate when one takes into account the
recent government decision to create a separate development board for
the already designated tribes (viz, Lepchas and Tamangs) of the hills as
a measure to better serve their interest. Luring the Lepchas and
Tamangs through a separate development board and packages has added new
incentives for ethnicising the idea of tribe.
The emphasis on tribal development boards or for that matter
favouring the communities to become a tribe might not be a rational
response to their region specific practical interests. Nevertheless the
collaborationist gesture adopted by the state was legitimised on the
ground of “development populism”. The concept of tribe in contemporary
Darjeeling hills has been strategically posed along the continuum of
politics-community-power. In a situation like this – where the state
approval meant almost every community could become a tribe – answers to
vexed questions like “who is a tribe?” or “what is a tribe?” were to be
sought not in ethnographic literature or in welfare imperatives, but in
the discourses of power.
The ethnicisation of tribal identity in the contemporary Darjeeling
hill is certainly a new development, which also helped the state scale
down the intensity and pace of the renewed call for Gorkhaland that took
place in the recent past during July to October 2013. However, the
question is whether such a policy of “engaging tribe” – a strategy
profitably used by the United States (US) in pacifying anti-US and
anti-imperial feelings of the Iraqis and Afghans – will reduce the
concept of the tribe to merely a “policy category”?
In Conclusion
It is as a consequence of this policy that many a community in the
Darjeeling hills are working hard to revive their erstwhile practices
linked with ancestral worship, “animism”, Shamanistic and / or Buddhist
rituals and so on. Through their revival of their “tribalist” cultural
traditions the hill communities are trying to search for and adopt new
identities. This will change their relationships with power and
privilege and could open up space for inter-community conflicts based on
differential political affiliations.
This is how the tribal identity issue has taken an ethnic detour
in contemporary Darjeeling hills, particularly since the state itself
is seen to encourage such a detour. The situational conditions, produced
and reproduced through the discourse of power, are sharpening the
fervour for authenticity and making distinctiveness and exclusivity a
widespread aspiration. The tribal identity claims of different
communities has loosened the idea of tribe from its classical
anthropological moorings and pushed it towards being a politically
productive “notion”.
Notes
[1] T B Subba has analysed in detail the differences between Nepali
caste system in India and Nepal and commented at length regarding the
socio-historical forces that resulted into the formation of a relatively
weak caste structure among the Indian Nepalis compared to their
brethren there in Nepal. For details, see Subba (1985:23-26).
[2]
Surendra Munshi and Ugen Lama’s study on the Tamangs of Darjeeling did
reveal the significance of caste in the complex and multidimensional
process of expressing their identity through the Nepali Tamang Buddhist
Association during the 1970s. For details, see Munshi and Lama (1978).
[3]
The data were collected from the website of Backward Classes Welfare
Department, Government of West Bengal. The number of the three
designated Nepali Schedules Castes in West Bengal (Kami, Damai and
Sarki) is 78,202. See Government of West Bengal (2001).
References
Government of West Bengal, Backward Classes Welfare Department (2001): State Primary Census Abstract for Individual Scheduled caste – 2001, available at http://www.anagrasarkalyan.gov.in/pdf/census-abstract-of%20SC-2001.pdf, accessed on 2 April 2014.
Munshi, Surendra and Ugen Lama (1978): “The Tamangs of Darjeeling: Organized Expression of the Ethnic Identity – Part II”, Journal of the Indian Anthropological Society, 13(3): 265-86.
Subba, Tanka Bahadur (1985): “Caste Relations in Nepal and India”, Social Change, 15(4): 23-26.
References
Government of West Bengal, Backward Classes Welfare Department (2001): State Primary Census Abstract for Individual Scheduled caste – 2001, available at http://www.anagrasarkalyan.gov.in/pdf/census-abstract-of%20SC-2001.pdf, accessed on 2 April 2014.
Munshi, Surendra and Ugen Lama (1978): “The Tamangs of Darjeeling: Organized Expression of the Ethnic Identity – Part II”, Journal of the Indian Anthropological Society, 13(3): 265-86.
Subba, Tanka Bahadur (1985): “Caste Relations in Nepal and India”, Social Change, 15(4): 23-26.
Economic and Political Weekly
