New Delhi: The senior Delhi government officer suspended last week for an ad that
portrayed Sikkim as a separate nation said he relied on a central
government document, “without realising” its description of the
northeastern state.
Speaking
to ThePrint Monday, Rahul Sudan said he was upset about what had
happened, but claimed he wasn’t the only person involved in formulating
the ad, which sought volunteers for the union territory’s civil defence
corps in light of the Covid-19 crisis
“Several other officers are involved
and the file and advertisements are published only after being approved
by the chief minister and the deputy chief minister, but I guess no one
realised,” said Sudan, 50, who served as senior staff officer (publication and coordination) in the Directorate of Civil Defence (headquarters).
Portrayed Sikkim as a separate nation |
The controversy stems from an ad
published by the Delhi government in newspapers Saturday, which invited
applicants for the civil defence corps, a largely volunteer-based
organisation that is mobilised at the time of emergencies and disasters.
The eligibility criteria stated that
applications were open to a “citizen of India or a subject of Sikkim or
of Bhutan or of Nepal and a resident of Delhi”. Sikkim objected immediately, saying the ad was “immensely hurtful” and “offensive”.
The confusion can be attributed to
the fact that the law overseeing the civil defence corps, the Civil
Defence Act, 1968, was first passed seven years before Sikkim became a
part of India in 1975. While the Act was updated in 1975 to reflect
Sikkim’s new status, the regulations issued in 1968 as part of the law weren’t.
The AAP has offered a similar
argument for the gaffe as Sudan, but Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA)
officers said it would be wrong to blame the controversy on central
government documents since the Act was updated and the change notified
in the official Gazette.
https://theprint.in.
Post a Comment
We love to hear from you! What's on your mind?