The mountain roads leading to Darjeeling from Silliguri are dotted
with a new kind of hoarding these days: The Gorkha Jan Mukti Morcha
(GJMM) that had only a year ago organised an indefinite general strike
in the hills against West Bengal Chief Minister Mamta Banerjee
interfering into the affairs of the Gorkhaland Territorial Authority
(GTA) has now put up hoardings thanking Banerjee for assuring
resolution of the identity crisis of the Gorkha people.
For
someone having lived the past few years in the eastern Himalayan region
and engaged with a large number of students from Darjeeling, these
hoardings make a surreal feeling. It took time for me to comprehend the
changes and also the second part of the writings on these hoarding. They
talk about a Third Front and the GJMM’s support to that. Mamata herself
may not be sure of what the front is all about and whether at all there
is space for a Third Front. But the Gorkha people seem to have made up
their mind.
The GJMM's writ ran large in the mountains and its
leader’s wishes to shut down life and communication across were turned
into reality until the winter of December 2018. Bimal Gurung has now
turned a fugitive as it happened with Subhas Ghising in the decade after
2000. The GJMM is now controlled by Binay Tamang — incidentally, Bimal
Gurung did this to Ghising in the late 1990s — and the Gorkha National
Liberation Front (GNLF), that Ghising led for at least three decades is a
pale shadow of what it was in its heydays.
After the intense
phase of the Gorkhaland movement began in the mid-1980s, the then ruling
Communist Party of India (Marxist) underwent a split and its cadre went
with the Communist Party of Revolutionary Marxists (CPRM) in support of
the demand for a separate Gorkhaland state. The CPI(M) was decimated in
the mountains and its offices were all shut down. The GNLF and
subsequently the GJMM ruled the electoral outcome from Darjeeling.
Inderjeet,
a journalist from Delhi, represented the constituency in the ninth and
tenth Lok Sabha (1989-1996) as independent in the first term (1989-96)
and as Congress MP subsequently. Though the CPI(M) wrested the
constituency for a brief while in the three Lok Sabhas between 1996 and
2004, the GJMM ensured it decided who shall represent the Gorkha people
in Parliament since 2009; the BJP won this seat because its leaders,
Jaswant Singh and S.S.Ahluwalia, managed to strike a bargain with Bimal
Gurung in 2009 and 2014, respectively.
Interestingly, Inderjeet
from Delhi, Jaswant Singh from Rajasthan and Ahluwalia from Dhanbad were
not Gorkhas as were those who represented the constituency before the
intense phase of the Gorkhaland movement since the 1980s. They were able
to negotiate a deal with the GNLF chief Ghising and later with the GJMM
strongman Bimal Gurung.
It is from this background that the
hoardings now seen dotting the national highway and in Kalimpong and
Darjeeling town are praising Mamata Banerjee. The GJMM leader Binay
Tamang has also announced his outfit’s support to the Trinamool Congress
for May 2019 elections. While it remains to be seen if Tamang can
ensure the Gorkha people vote for Mamata Banerjee’s candidate, the fact
that the Trinamool chief could even manage a split in the GJMM and the
banishment of Bimal Gurung is a feat. The CPI(M) for all its cadre
strength and organisational prowess could not achieve this in the thirty
years. The Gorkhaland movement dominated the Darjeeling hills and even
ended up seeing its own organisation splitting.
The question,
however, is whether these adjustments and the arrangements that Mamata
has ensured in the politics of the hills will put the lid on the
aspirations of the Gorkha people, who speak a distinct language – Nepali
– and belong to a culture too distinct from the Bengali people for a
separate state? If that happens, it will be sad given the commitment our
constitutional scheme provides for the linguistic re-organisation of
states.
For, similar cooption of such assertions and the forces
that represented assertions such as language and culture in the rest of
northeastern India have not led to lasting peace. Where such cooption
had achieved a sense of peace at the outset have also led to violent and
separatist demands elsewhere in the region. This is where the
legitimacy for a constitutional arrangement ensuring the autonomy of the
Darjeeling Hills region as is provided for the various states in the
North-East under the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution.
An
amendment to the Constitution to include Darjeeling in the Sixth
Schedule could ensure constitution of an Autonomous Hill Council and
this must be addressed to in real earnest. It may appear simple on the
face of it; it is not in the practical sense. But the task of ensuring
the idea of India work is not to be short-circuited because it is a
difficult one.
Post a Comment
We love to hear from you! What's on your mind?